ANALISIS KEWENANGAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM PENGAWASAN HAKIM KONSTITUSI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 005/PUU-IV/2006 PERSPEKTIF FIQH SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH

RIDHO, JUSKA FIRNANDO (2025) ANALISIS KEWENANGAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM PENGAWASAN HAKIM KONSTITUSI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 005/PUU-IV/2006 PERSPEKTIF FIQH SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH. Diploma thesis, UIN Raden Intan Lampung.

	PDF Download (1MB)
	PDF Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)

Abstract

ABSTRAK Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) No. 005/PUU-IV/2006 telah membatasi kewenangan Komisi Yudisial (KY) dalam mengawasi hakim konstitusi, dengan alasan prinsip independensi peradilan. Namun, hal ini menimbulkan perdebatan mengenai efektivitas pengawasan terhadap hakim konstitusi, mengingat MK sebagai lembaga penafsir konstitusi memegang peran krusial dalam sistem ketatanegaraan. Penelitian ini menganalisis implikasi putusan tersebut dari perspektif fiqh siyasah dusturiyah (hukum ketatanegaraan dalam Islam), yang menekankan checks and balances dalam penyelenggaraan kekuasaan kehakiman. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode library research dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi literatur terhadap sumber-sumber primer seperti Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 005/PUU IV/2006, peraturan perundang-undangan, serta referensi sekunder seperti buku, jurnal, dan artikel ilmiah terkait wewenang Komis Yudisial dan konsep siyasah dusturiyah. Analisis dilakukan secara deskriptif-analitis dengan teknik content analysis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembatasan kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dalam mengawasi hakim konstitusi bertentangan dengan prinsip siyasah dusturiyah, yang menegaskan pentingnya pengawasan (muraqabah) untuk mencegah penyalahgunaan kekuasaan (zulm). Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Pasca Putusan MK No. 005/PUU-IV/2006, kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dalam melakukan pengawasan terhadap Hakim Konstitusi mengalami pembatasan secara substansial. Implikasinya, Komisi Yudisial tidak lagi memiliki otoritas untuk mengawasi Hakim Konstitusi, sebab kewenangan tersebut sepenuhnya beralih kepada mekanisme pengawasan internal Mahkamah Konstitusi. Dalam perspektif fiqh siyasah dusturiyah, pembatasan kewenangan Komisi Yudisial untuk mengawasi Hakim Konstitusi pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 005/PUU-IV/2006 dinilai tidak sejalan dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum ketatanegaraan Islam. Hal ini disebabkan peran Komisi Yudisial dalam pengawasan hakim konstitusi merupakan hal yang esensial, sebagaimana konsep al-murāqabah (pengawasan) yang diimplementasikan oleh lembaga Qāḍhi al-Quḍāh dalam sistem pemerintahan Islam. Kata Kunci: Komisi Yudisial, Mahkamah Konstitusi, fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah. ABSTRACT Decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) No. 005/PUU-IV/2006 has limited the authority of the Judicial Commission (KY) in supervising constitutional judges, citing the principle of judicial independence. However, this raises a debate about the effectiveness of supervision of constitutional judges, considering that the Constitutional Court as a constitutional interpretation institution plays a crucial role in the constitutional system. This study analyzes the implications of the decision from the perspective of fiqh siyasah dusturiyah (state law in Islam), which emphasizes checks and balances in the administration of judicial power. This research uses a library research method with a qualitative approach. Data were collected through literature study of primary sources such as Constitutional Court Decision No. 005/PUU-IV/2006, laws and regulations, as well as secondary references such as books, journals, and scientific articles related to the authority of the Judicial Commission and the concept of siyasah dusturiyah. The analysis is done descriptively-analytically with content analysis technique. The results show that the limitation of the Judicial Commission's authority in supervising constitutional judges is contrary to the principle of siyasah dusturiyah, which emphasizes the importance of supervision (muraqabah) to prevent abuse of power (zulm). The results showed that after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 005/PUU-IV/2006, the authority of the Judicial Commission in supervising Constitutional Judges was substantially restricted. The implication is that the Judicial Commission no longer has the authority to supervise Constitutional Judges, because this authority is fully transferred to the internal supervisory mechanism of the Constitutional Court. In the perspective of fiqh siyasah dusturiyah, the limitation of the Judicial Commission's authority to supervise Constitutional Judges after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 005/PUU-IV/2006 is considered not in line with the principles of Islamic constitutional law. This is because the role of the Judicial Commission in supervising constitutional judges is essential, as is the concept of al-murāqabah (supervision) implemented by the institution of Qāḍhi al-Quḍāh in the Islamic government system. Keywords: Judicial Commission, Constitutional Court, fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah.

Actions (login required)

View Item